I've lost count of the number of courses I went on during my
working life, but one thing that stands out about them is the way in which they
changed over the years. By the time I left work the majority of courses
focussed on soft skills like communication, managing people and being a leader,
but in the early days of my time in Midland Bank the courses were about the
nuts and bolts of specific roles in the organisation.
Before I had even set foot in a branch I went on an
Induction Course, which taught the uninitiated what banks did and what sort of
roles we would be performing. After
starting work at Gants Hill I was sent on a Remittances Course, a Control
Course and a Cashiering Course[1].
Later there were Basic and Advanced Foreign Courses and sundry others. Midland
Bank had a Training Branch at Buchanan House in Holborn, just by Chancery Lane
tube and what was striking about the place was how strict the rules were. It
was a lot more formal than working in a branch, and believe me in the mid
1970's it was pretty rigid in branches.
Buchanan House. Picture: Google Maps. |
One of the first things that was mentioned on courses at
Holborn was the management rule about moustaches and beards or facial hair in
general. Men were told that if they arrived at Training Branch on day one of
their course clean shaven, then they were expected to remain so for the
duration of it. Bizarrely, Training Branch management thought that away from
the their normal office environment, men would immediately take the opportunity
to grow beards or moustaches and that this would not project a neat image, that
the public would somehow be affronted by Midland Bank staff growing facial hair;
therefore it was forbidden. Graciously, management allowed that men already in
possession of beards or moustaches would not be obliged to shave them off.
There being an actual branch of Midland Bank on the ground
floor of Training Branch, one might have expected that being customers of the
Bank as well as Staff members, attendees on courses could take advantage of
these facilities to cash cheques or pay money into their accounts. This was
most definitely not allowed. It was feared that lunchtimes would see the Branch
so gummed up with people from the various courses queuing to cash cheques that
the whole place would grind to a halt. In fact there always seemed to be a
perception among the course tutors that, freed from the strictures of working
in their normal Branch or Department, course attendees would run amok. In
actual fact boredom was a more common occupational hazard on these courses,
driven by the fact that many people were on whichever course it was at the
wrong time. Some people were sent on courses too early, sometimes even before
they had done the job it related to at all. The course therefore would go right
over their heads. Others would have been doing the job for so long that the
course added no value. These people often knew more about the job that the
tutors and were usually a valuable source of knowledge for the small band of
people who were, in the manner of Goldilocks, on the course at about the right
time, having done the job for sufficient time to have an understanding but not
too long that they knew it all. Of course there would occasionally be something
that everyone wanted to learn about, normally something that was rarely encountered
in Branches. Such a thing was Automatic Transfers. I can't recall anyone in
Branches understanding them, so when I was sent on a Control Course I was
particularly keen to find out about them, and so it seemed was everyone else on
the course. Naturally therefore, Automatic Transfers were glossed over and not
dealt with at all, leading me to believe that either the tutors knew nothing
about them (very probable) or that they did not in fact work properly (equally
likely). On reflection, it is more than likely that both were true.
Some people were sent on courses simply to get them out of
the Branch. At times when there was no one on holiday and there were more
people than jobs, sending someone on a course, no matter how inappropriate, was
a good way of getting them out of the way. Hence there would be Cashiers on
Foreign Courses being taught about Documentary Credits when the sum total of
the foreign work in their branches was the sale of currency and travellers
cheques. And there were many people who went on courses and then went back to
their branches only to find that it would be months before they had the
opportunity to do the job the course related to, which rather diminished the
benefit of attending the thing in the first place.
In those far off days when flared trousers and kipper ties
were de rigueur but not everyone in
the country had a bank account, Midland Bank Staff Accounts were constantly
under scrutiny. Management appeared to be terrified that staff would misuse
their accounts. Overdrafts were not allowed, money going into a staff account
(other than the Bank's salary) was treated with suspicion and required
managerial approval, grudgingly granted only after an interrogation in which
all that was missing was a bright light shone in the eyes of account holder. Applying
for a credit card or personal loan required much more hoop jumping than would
have been the case for a regular customer. Stories circulating at the time
included one about the member of Staff refused a Personal Loan to buy a car on
the grounds that the car he wanted to buy was superior to that owned by his
Manager, who would therefore not permit this since he (the Manager) could not
be seen driving a car inferior to one of his subordinates.
If these restrictions
were driven by a terror of fraud or theft on the part of a member of Staff then
it was perhaps ironic that two of a very small number of cases of dishonesty that
I heard about during my years in the Bank were attributed to people who worked
at Training Branch. One case, which went to court and was reported in the
national press, involved a tutor who misappropriated expenses. Course attendees
were paid travelling expenses, in cash in my early days in the Bank, and one
tutor was in the habit of inflating claims and creaming off the difference,
which ran to thousands of pounds, albeit over a fair number of years. Another
tale, which may or may not have been true, involved the cafeteria at Buchanan
House. This served a desultory selection of rolls and sandwiches, crisps and
chocolate bars and apparently turned a regular, if modest profit. Then the chap
who ran the cafeteria was taken ill and spent some time on sick leave. Profits
soared under his replacement's control, only to be restored to their more
modest levels upon the original chap's return. If the rumours were true, the
only thing being cooked in the cafeteria were the books.
Much of what I learned at Training Branch had to be treated
with a liberal pinch of salt because as everyone who has worked anywhere knows,
there is a correct way of doing things and practical way of doing them. Mind
you, I can still remember the definition of conversion.[2]
[1]
For the non-bank types, Remittance, often called Waste, consisted of (among
other things) batching up cheques and credits paid in over the counter and
processing them for input or despatch to Head Office. Control was a job that
included checking entries input on the computer (dumb terminal), dealing with
unpaid cheques and balancing the books
at the end of the day. Cashiering is self evident.
[2]
"By our actions, we deprive the true owner of their rightful
property."
A very well timed blog as 18th July was the 37th anniversary of the day yours truly arrived at Buchanan House for my Induction Course wearing my new three piece suit and shiny shoes. Brings back memories of the Securities course and learning the right way to fill out a custody receipt !
ReplyDeleteThe right way...which didn't always equate to the way we did things in Branches!
ReplyDelete