How much longer we remain in this situation is anyone’s
guess, although I would suspect it will be longer than the more optimistic
estimates, especially as there still remain many people who are not taking
isolation or social distancing sufficiently seriously. Many people are still
travelling when they need not, and many have jobs that require them to commute
however, I wonder how worse off we would have been had this pandemic struck
thirty, forty years ago, or more?
In particular, had this pandemic happened during the 1970s, how
would we have managed? The 1970s were a time when the UK was frequently short
of something or the other, whether it was bread when the bakers went on
strike, or potatoes when the harvest was blighted by bad weather, or oil when
OPEC introduced an embargo. Along with power cuts, there was always seemed to
be a shortage of something (see The 1970's: Part Two - Strikes, Shortages, and Substitutes).
In those days, empty shelves in the
supermarkets made us shrug our shoulders and improvise.
Had 1970s Britain had to go into lockdown things would have
been different from today in many respects. The biggest difference is driven by
the internet, and it is largely thanks to that that even before this pandemic,
1.5 million Britons were working from home, and that figure will have increased
significantly in response to coronavirus. In the 1970s, working from home was
not an option except for a tiny minority. Given that many jobs that are now
made easier by automation and computerisation were heavily manual during the
1970s, most employers would have expected their staff to carry on regardless in
that era. For my part, having started work in 1976 and working in branch banking,
there would have been little scope for me to do anything other than my normal
job, in my normal place of work, and having to use public transport to get
there.
In the 1970s cash was king. Most shopping transactions were
complete with notes and coins; those that weren’t involved a different form of
paper in the shape of cheques. In recent years we have become used to debit
cards, Chip & Pin, and now contactless methods of payment, which is just as
well since most shops are now only reluctantly accepting cash due to its
potential as a means of transmitting the virus. Even before coronavirus, I had
pretty much converted to paying with my phone except where that wasn’t an
option and I currently don’t have a single banknote to my name, while all of
my coins are quarantined.
If we had ended up in lockdown fifty years ago, we would not
have had the number of diversions that we have today. We had just three TV
channels (Channel 4 started broadcasting in 1982), and there was very little worth watching before early evening anyway. No streaming services, no videos or
DVDs. No social media; really, we can have no complaints today about having to
spend time at home, and we have no reason to be bored.
As is the case with almost every aspect of it, the internet
has been a force for good, and not so good in these times. Apart from enabling
people to work from home – including broadcasters, with radio and TV shows
being recorded from kitchens and living rooms up and down the country – virtual
exercise classes are being shown on social media. Ten days ago I’d not even
heard of Zoom, but my wife has been logging on to it daily to join in with
various classes being run by our local YMCA. We did a virtual pub quiz the
other day, along with about 16,000 other people, and of course, Facetime and
other video messaging services have been a boon for people who are
self-isolating and thus estranged from family and friends.
But the internet would not be the internet without the
negative, and social media highlights and amplifies this. Twitter is the worst
for this in my experience, both in terms of original posts and the reactions to
them; much of the content at present is extremely pessimistic about the
prognosis of the current pandemic, and as ever, Twitter seems to attract the
sort of person for whom logical argument and civilised debate can never replace
abuse and ignorance in any conversation.
In fairness though, I did have some very civilised Twitter
exchanges with people I know only through that medium on my birthday this week.
In fact, social media made my birthday a much more convivial experience than it
would have been otherwise, as apart from my immediate family, I didn’t see
anyone. Having said that, that’s actually not that unusual!
For all its faults though, the internet is invaluable for
keeping us up to date with news from official sources – and the not so official
ones. In the 1970s we were limited to a daily newspaper and TV and radio news
broadcasts, and if we think back to the Falklands conflict in 1982, the news we
got from the frontline was heavily censored. Today, for good or ill, the
official news we get is subject to a great deal more scrutiny, although as ever
we must apply a good deal of scepticism to all that we read, whether it is the
source or the critique.
Boredom and too much time on our hands browsing social
media on the internet may mean being inveigled into doing quizzes, or answering
those seemingly innocent questions that ask things like, where did you go on
the first flight you took? Or, who were the first band you saw live? Or, the
name of your first school, first pet, or the road you grew up in. Or, perhaps
take the name of your first pet and your mother’s maiden name to make your
movie star name. Do any of those things sound familiar? They ought to because
those are the sort of things that your bank asks as security questions. Just
for fun, why don’t you share a picture of your credit card, and post the
three-digit code that’s on the reverse as well? Then we can all check back this
time next week and see whose bank account was cleaned out first.
Coronavirus is a storm that we all hope and pray will soon
abate. In the meantime all we are being asked to do to make sure we ride it out
is stay indoors, watch TV, read books, play games, catch up on odd jobs, and
chat with our friends and family (in person with those we live with, online
with those we don’t). We don’t have to take to an air-raid shelter at night,
and we don’t go to sleep wondering if we’ll have a house to live in the next
morning. It’s not a big price to pay, so stay at home, and stay safe!
No comments:
Post a Comment