Time travel is impossible, but wishful thinking on the part
of many writers means that it is a fairly common theme in fiction. And while it
was once the preserve of the science-fiction writer, it's fair to say that it
is becoming slightly more mainstream and is a device used both in books and in
television as a medium to revisit past times and re-invent history. H G Wells
pretty much invented the genre with The
Time Machine, although Mark Twain's A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court
pre-dates it by six years, and other classics include To Say Nothing of the Dog by Connie Willis and Slaughterhouse
- Five by Kurt Vonnegut. I have recently read Ben Elton's time travel
novel, Time and Time Again and am
currently reading Steven King's 11.22.63,
which I want to finish before starting to watch the TV adaptation.
Rod Taylor in the film of The Time Machine |
Ben Elton is an interesting character; he first came to
prominence as a right-on, Left-wing, stand up comedian, ranting about the
uselessness of motorway service tea pots and Margaret Thatcher. Then he became
a national treasure when he collaborated with Richard Curtis to write Blackadder. As a novelist, his books are
difficult to pigeon-hole; he doesn't fit into any convenient, single genre. His
works include murder mystery, talent show satire and life in Nazi Germany. The
premise of Time and Time Again is
that if you could travel back in time and change one event, would you, could
you and if so, which one event? Elton's protagonist, ex-SAS type Hugh Stanton,
is sent back to 1914 to thwart the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand
and thereby prevent the outbreak of war. The law of unintended consequences
kicks in, and without wishing to spoil the book for anyone who is thinking of
reading it, history changes in many unexpected ways and with multiple strands
of time intertwining. King's novel has a similar premise. High school English
teacher Jake Epping travels back to 1963 (via 1958 - it's a long novel) in an
attempt to stop Lee Harvey Oswald from assassinating President John F Kennedy,
righting some other wrongs on the way.
Despite the fact that time travel is not possible, most
writers are mindful of the butterfly effect and the danger of temporal
paradoxes, although stories such as the one in the film Somewhere in Time exploit these so-called bootstrap paradoxes
(named for the Robert Heinlein time-travel story, By His Bootstraps) - in fact the whole story in the film is
predicated on one such paradox.
If time travel were possible it is safe to assume that there
would be a comprehensive set of restrictions imposed on anyone wanting to
travel back in time; less so (if any) on anyone wishing to travel forward,
presumably. So, if you could go back, when would you go back to and what, if
anything would you change? Let's set aside the idea of travelling to the 1930's
and killing Adolf Hitler, or preventing the assassination of Kennedy, or Martin
Luther King, or just going back and putting a bundle of money on Red Rum
winning three consecutive Grand Nationals, what would you do, what could you
do, that would actually be useful? (and even then, should you do it?)
Red Rum on his way to Grand National glory. |
Perhaps the most likely thing you would do is correct your
own mistakes, or more usefully, prevent yourself making them in the first
place. It's apparently quite common for people to write a letter to their
younger self; it is supposed to be cathartic. But apart from absolving yourself
of guilt over any past actions, misdeeds or mistakes, these letters change
nothing; imagine what the impact would be if your letter could actually be
delivered to your younger self. What would you say?
Perhaps you would try to prevent your young counterpart
having to face a traumatic or life changing experience. For instance, my first
wife, June, died of a brain haemorrhage which the doctors told me after the
event could have happened at any time and which it might not have been possible
to have prevented with surgery before it occurred had anyone known it was going
to happen. It's probable that even with prior knowledge of her condition, her life
might not have been saved; would I change the past by preventing my younger
self from marrying her, or even dating her? Yes, it would have saved me so much
grief, but I would have missed out on much joy and happiness too. And who knows
what (different) distress and heartache I might have experienced had my life
taken a different course?
If I could deliver that letter, I would not tell myself to
change anything specific, what I would do is attempt to change my mind set. I
would say, "Don't say No, don't accept No, but don't worry about being
told No." For a lot of my life I said No to things because I worried about
the consequences; I probably missed out on a lot of things by saying No when I
should have said Yes. They say you should not regret the things you have done,
only the things you haven't and looking back I wish I'd been braver and not
said No at times. A lot of times I was told No when I asked to do something (particularly
when I asked my parents if I could do something); I wish I'd been braver and
not taken No for an answer (well, not without a damn good reason anyway). And I
wish I hadn't been scared to be told No at times. I suppose I cannot be the only person who has
been so daunted by the prospect of a refusal and therefore not asked the
question, whatever it may be, rather than be told No. The rationale is that if
you don't ask, you can't know if you would be rebuffed and you'll be happier
that way. But if you do ask, your request may not even be denied, so what do
you have to lose? For a very little word, "No" has a huge impact on
our lives; a lesson for us all - regardless of the fact that we cannot educate
our younger selves about it - is that we should pay less heed to the word. Mind
you, I am a fine one to talk. I have often been told that I am a quite negative
person (although I have tried to shake that off over the years) and
"No" has played a significant role in my life, more so that it should
have; if I could go back and berate myself about anything it would be about not
being so negative.
On the whole, it is fortunate we cannot change the past,
better that we learn from it to influence our future.
No comments:
Post a Comment